Ok, we know we’ve been calling it the fatty, but we’ll be straight up with you guys: the third gen iPod nano is friggin’ tiny. It’s maybe not the most beautifully proportioned iPod we’ve ever seen, but its tapered edges and ridiculously thin frame make up for the squatness going on here.[…] Thanks to supernova17 for providing this nice story on Digg.
What other users say about this:
Zoglog: Wow, talk about the crappiest image gallery in this article ever. It’s just the same pic of the ipod nano with the idiot’s finger moving around in 5 different shots…… Engadget fails again
combustion8: But does the sound quality still suck?
dtzitz: FUCK THE RIAA
Jelmertjee: Hmm to be honest I think they went the wrong way with the design here, the older nano versions looked a lot better… now it’s almost like any ordinary mp3/video player..
ripstuntz: No side view pictures? What is this UNISEF?
Speed: Engadget: We sacrifice quality and journalistic integrity to be the first story submitted to Digg.
coolharshal: After some time I realised that most of the features of iPod touch will be not that useful as its still a pain to use public WiFi hotspots. So, No web-browsing using Safari, No You-Tube videos and No online music downloads. And yes, there is no inbuilt Radio. But still I’ll wait for couple of months for a refurbished piece to appear on Apple site.
check out : http://way.to/ritw
jads: I think I must be the only one that kinda likes the look if it… now watching video on it for longer than 10 minutes is going to be interesting though.
GMMStraider: Ok, it IS small… but why does it have to be so sqarelike? 1 cm more length wouldn’t of been the end of the world, and the nano would look 100 times better….
jrseney: lol, dugg up b/c they admit it really is such a little fatty 😛
csimpkins: That interface looks like it’s straight from Windows 3.1.
handy7390: Because, if you want a sideways player, you buy the Creative POS.
(Not sure how I posted this here) (see above)
sb76117: but will it blend?
firedrillduckie: I actually prefer the look of the 1st generation nanos… Like the “classic,” but tiny-er. I mean, I enjoy my red 2nd gen one, but I prefer the look of the 1st gen.
lucask: So the photochops were correct